Enhancing Social License to Operate Through Stakeholder Engagement and Governance at PT Freeport Indonesia

Authors

  • Rihensky Warren Mrobyar Mambri Ap Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Yudo Anggoro Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46799/adv.v4i10.728

Keywords:

Stakeholder Engagement, Social License To Operate, Governance, Customary Institutions, Community Relations Mining Industry

Abstract

This study examined (1) the underlying causes of stakeholder dissatisfaction with PT Freeport Indonesia's (PTFI) community development programs, (2) aspects of program implementation and stakeholder engagement requiring improvement, and (3) strategies PTFI could adopt to align stakeholder expectations with program implementation. A descriptive qualitative case study design was employed, drawing on semi-structured interviews with ten informants representing PTFI management, YPMAK, LEMASA, LEMASKO, community and church leaders, and local interest groups. The interviews were supplemented by company documents and grievance records. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase thematic analysis framework, integrated with Mendelow's stakeholder mapping framework, gap analysis, and Zadek's (2004) corporate responsibility maturity model. The analysis generated 20 codes, six themes, and three key issues, revealing that stakeholder dissatisfaction stemmed primarily from the unequal distribution of program benefits, challenges to the legitimacy of LEMASA and LEMASKO, and transactional stakeholder engagement practices lacking formal community feedback mechanisms, rather than solely from program ineffectiveness. PTFI was assessed as operating at the managerial stage of corporate responsibility maturity, with indications of progression toward the strategic stage. The study proposed a five-year action plan comprising four implementation phases and highlighted the importance of engagement quality, rather than the volume of social investment alone, in strengthening and maintaining a social license to operate within an Indigenous community mining context.

References

Antara News. (2025). Freeport setor Rp7,73 triliun bagian pemerintah atas laba 2024. https://gorontalo.antaranews.com/berita/316033/freeport-setor-rp773-triliun-bagian-pemerintah-atas-laba-2024

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chandler, D. (2023). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Sustainable value creation (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Chipangamate, N. S., Nwaila, G. T., Bourdeau, J. E., & Zhang, S. E. (2023). Integration of stakeholder engagement practices in pursuit of social licence to operate in a modernising mining industry. Resources Policy, 85(Part B), Article 103851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103851

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Hamid, R. S., & Lubis, M. (2024). Inclusive policies and distribution of green economic transformation of mining areas: A regional development perspective. The Journal of Distribution Science, 22(3), 71–81.

Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E., & Sá de Abreu, M. C. (2015). Stakeholder theory as an ethical approach to effective management: Applying the theory to multiple contexts. Review of Business Management, 17(55), 858–869. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v17i55.2647

Harun, A. A., Puluhulawa, F. U., ElFikri, N. F., & Moha, M. R. (2023). Indonesian mining regulations shift as a potential sector in developing the economy. Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 16(2), 419–434.

Henisz, W. J. (2014). Corporate diplomacy: Building reputations and relationships with external stakeholders. Greenleaf Publishing.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

Nelson, R., Grosse, R., Ault, J., Valencia, B., & Wocke, A. (2026). Mining in emerging markets: Community relations and the social license to operate. Management International Review, 1–32.

Nugroho, B. S., Judijanto, L., & Sudarmanto, E. (2024). Assessing the role of community participation in mediating the impact of social financial practices on business performance in Indonesia’s palm oil industry. The ES Accounting and Finance, 3(1), 52–64.

Pajak.com. (2025). PTFI sumbang Rp80 triliun untuk negara, Tony Wenas: Kontribusi terbesar dari satu perusahaan. https://www.pajak.com/ekonomi/ptfi-sumbang-rp80-triliun-untuk-negara-tony-wenas-kontribusi-terbesar-dari-satu-perusahaan/

Sokoy, F. (2026). Social conflict between the Amungme and Kamoro traditional tribe and Freeport Indonesia company on environmental impact. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, Article 102432.

Sukasuka, G. N. (2025). A framework for the ex-post evaluation of the social sustainability of public-private partnership infrastructure projects in South Africa [Dissertation, University of Johannesburg].

Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2011). Social license to operate. In P. Darling (Ed.), SME mining engineering handbook (3rd ed., pp. 1779–1796). Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.

Udohaya, N. (2025). Current trends in impact investing. In Impact investing and financial inclusion: Examining the innovations that empower the underserved (pp. 291–322).

Umar, U., Sari, E., & Umar, F. (2025). The paradox of economic development: Environmental sustainability and economic growth of the mining industry in Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Business (JECOMBI), 6(2), 93–103.

Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 82(12), 125–132.

Zou, C., Gao, W., & Ai, F. (2025). Strategic mineral policies for Indonesia: Enhancing global competitiveness, economic growth, and environmental sustainability through innovation and renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 244, Article 122593.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-24

How to Cite

Mambri Ap, R. W. M., & Anggoro , Y. . (2026). Enhancing Social License to Operate Through Stakeholder Engagement and Governance at PT Freeport Indonesia. Advances In Social Humanities Research, 4(10), 1648–1662. https://doi.org/10.46799/adv.v4i10.728