The Effectiveness of Using Inaproc in the Procurement Process for Goods and Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/adv.v4i9.642Keywords:
INAPROC, e-procurement, procurement effectiveness, user satisfaction, transparencyAbstract
The transformation of government procurement of goods and services in Indonesia increasingly relies on integrated digital platforms such as INAPROC to improve efficiency, transparency, accountability, and the quality of public services. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of INAPROC in the procurement process by evaluating dimensions of process performance, including time and cost efficiency, information accuracy, and operational ease; governance, including transparency and accountability; and user experience, including ease of use and satisfaction. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study surveys INAPROC users, including procurement officials, Commitment-Making Officials (Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen/PPK), system operators, and vendors, and complements the survey with targeted interviews to obtain deeper insights into user experiences. The analytical framework integrates the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to provide a comprehensive evaluation. The findings indicate that INAPROC is highly effective in strengthening transparency and accountability in procurement governance; however, its practical efficiency remains constrained by limitations in system quality and support services. The study is expected to identify the key factors determining INAPROC’s effectiveness and provide evidence-based recommendations for improving the quality of digital procurement services.
References
Aminah, S., Ditari, Y., Kumaralalita, L., Hidayanto, A. N., Phusavat, K., & Anussornnitisarn, P. (2018). E-procurement system success factors and their impact on transparency perceptions: Perspectives from the supplier side. Electronic Government, 14(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2018.090929
Arifin, K., Daga, R., & Anshar, M. A. (2023). Analisis penerapan e-katalog terhadap efektifitas dan kepuasan penyedia pada biro pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Sains Manajemen Nitro, 2(2), 193–205.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
Boehm, F., & Olaya, J. (2006). Corruption in public contracting auctions: The role of transparency in bidding processes. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 77(4), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2006.00314.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
Croom, S., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2007). Impact of e-procurement: Experiences from implementation in the UK public sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(4), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2007.09.015
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Dharmawan, W., & Widiyarta, A. (2025). The effectiveness of e-procurement in implementing the procurement of goods and services in the Surabaya City Government. Jurnal Aristo (Social, Politic, Humaniora), 13(1), 106–127.
Diani, F., & Lubis, F. A. (2022). Analisis implementasi e-katalog terhadap perkembangan UMKM di Kota Medan dalam mendukung kemajuan ekonomi syariah. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(2), 1970–1981.
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Habibi, M. M., & Untari, S. (2018). Efektivitas pelaksanaan e-procurement dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 3(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v3i2p159-168
Habiburrochman, H., & Fatimah, S. (2020). The effect of monopoly power, asymmetric information, transparency and accountability towards intent to adopt e-procurement. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 7, Article 456.
Harjito, Y., Achyani, F., & Payamta. (2016). Implementasi e-procurement ditinjau dari kesuksesan sistem teknologi informasi dengan menggunakan model DeLone dan McLean. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 18(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v18i1.263
Iqbal, M. (2020). Implementasi e-katalog dan dampaknya terhadap UMKM dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 11(2), 85–96.
Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38(12), 1217–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
Juniawan, R., Yusuf, M., & Junaidi. (2021). Pelaksanaan pengadaan barang/jasa secara elektronik (e-procurement) pada Satuan Kerja Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Pencerah Publik, 8(1), 30–37.
Khairina, E., & Dompak, T. (2022). Tinjauan terhadap e-procurement di Indonesia. Dialektika Publik, 6(1), 14–23.
Neupane, A., Soar, J., & Vaidya, K. (2014). An empirical evaluation of the potential of public e-procurement to reduce corruption. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v18i2.780
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Putra, E. A. (2024). Analisis kepuasan pengguna e-katalog dan kemudahan penggunaan terhadap efektivitas belanja barang di lingkungan TNI AL. Router: Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Terapan, 2(1), 1–7.
Ridwan, Dwiputra, F., Rumpoko, G. A., & Mutaqin, M. I. (2025). One-stop shopping platform: Transformasi katalog elektronik dalam pengadaan di sektor kesehatan. Pajak dan Manajemen Keuangan (PAJAMKEU), 2(1), 1–21.
Saputro, P. H. (2015). Analisis kesuksesan e-government dengan model DeLone dan McLean. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 10(1), 1–10.
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
