Utilization of State-Confiscated Property from Corruption Crimes Through Lease Agreements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/adv.v4i9.625Keywords:
State Convicted Good, Use, LeaseAbstract
State-confiscated property refers to state property derived from seized objects or items of evidence that have been declared forfeited to the state pursuant to a final and binding court decision, as well as other property declared forfeited through a judicial determination or court decision. Effective management of such assets constitutes an important aspect of state asset administration because it supports accountability and the optimization of economic value for the state. The disposal of these assets is generally carried out through public auction by the State Property and Auction Services Office (Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang [KPKNL]). However, assets that remain unsold must continue to be maintained to preserve their economic value, which may generate substantial storage, security, and maintenance costs. To address this issue, Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia No. 145/PMK.06/2021 permits the utilization of state-confiscated property through lease agreements. Under this mechanism, certain maintenance and security responsibilities may be transferred to the utilization partner, while the state retains ownership of the property and receives Non-Tax State Revenue (Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak [PNBP]). Nevertheless, legal uncertainty remains regarding the characteristics of state-confiscated property that may be leased and the legal enforceability of the resulting lease agreements. Using normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study examines the characteristics of state-confiscated property eligible for lease and analyzes the legal validity of such agreements. The findings are expected to provide a conceptual framework for optimizing state asset management and to support the enhancement of Non-Tax State Revenue through legally sound asset-utilization practices.
References
Abdulkadir Muhammad. (1986). Hukum perjanjian. Alumni.
Albnian, A. A., & Alhafnawi, M. F. A. (2026). The legal nature of the lease contract. In Artificial intelligence for sustainable innovation management and risk management: A systems (and network) perspective (pp. 1229–1241). Springer.
Asnakew, M. B., Amogne, M. K., Abebe, K. T., & Gebru, M. A. (2024). Land rights, bases of informal settlements and bogus contract documents as a means of urban fringe legal land transactions in Ethiopia. Cities, 149, 104954.
Bahram, M. (2025). Exploring the neglected dimensions: The function and purpose of law in contemporary society. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam, 15(1), 98–128.
Farrokhi, M. H. (2025). The evolution of contract law: Principles, challenges, and future trends. Advanced Journal of Management, Humanity and Social Science, 1(5), 305–315.
Harahap, Y. M. (2014). Segi-segi hukum perjanjian (2nd ed.). Alumni.
Istiqomah, M. (2026). Asset recovery of corruption proceeds through mutual legal assistance in Indonesia. Jurnal Legalitas, 19(1), 82–102.
Lescrauwaet, L., Wagner, H., Yoon, C., & Shukla, S. (2022). Adaptive legal frameworks and economic dynamics in emerging technologies: Navigating the intersection for responsible innovation. Law and Economics, 16(3), 202–220.
Mertokusumo, S. (1991). Mengenal hukum. Liberty.
Nugroho, F., Hartiwiningsih, H., & Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2025). Rethinking subsidiary in corruption cases: Indonesian experiences. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5(2), 686–713.
Perlman, A. (2023). The implications of ChatGPT for legal services and society. Michigan Technology Law Review, 30, 1.
Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 115/PMK.06/2020 tentang Pemanfaatan Barang Milik Negara. (2020). Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020 Nomor 972.
Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 145/PMK.06/2021 tentang Pengelolaan Barang Milik Negara yang Berasal dari Barang Rampasan Negara dan Barang Gratifikasi. (2021). Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2021 Nomor 1991.
Rannu, D. A., & Lie, G. (2024). Application of standard agreements in lease purchase contracts: Legal implications of business in the realm of civil law. Syntax Idea, 6(4), 1930–1939.
Rizky, M. C., & Darmawan, D. (2024). Legal aspects and implementation of an effective and fair house lease agreement. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(10).
Shalihah, F., Khojaev, B. K., Umirov, F., Husain, M. I., & Putranti, D. (2026). The impact of asset recovery regulations on corruption cases in Indonesian: A leap forward? Contrarius, 2(3), 275–294.
Soeherman, S., & Widyaningrum, T. (2026). Recovery of state assets through the management of assets resulting from criminal acts with the principle of ongoing concern: Maintaining the sustainability of asset settlement. LEGAL BRIEF, 14(6), 1210–1218.
Subekti. (2014). Aneka perjanjian. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Turitsyn, D. A. (2022). Digital contract in the civil legal system.
Tyogunawan, A., Din, M., Rizanizarli, R., Darmawan, D., & Johari, J. (2026). Management of confiscated assets by the prosecutor’s office: A comparative study between Indonesia and the United States. Administrative and Environmental Law Review, 7(1), 21–34.
Ywanjono, B. M., Hartiwiningsih, H., & Suwadi, P. (2024). Optimizing recovery of state losses: Effective strategy for tracing corrupt assets at the investigation stage. International Conference on Cultural Policy and Sustainable Development (ICPSD 2024), 369–375.
