Feasibility Evaluation of Repurposing Subsea Gas Pipelines i the Floating Storage and Regasification Unit System in West Java – Muara Karang Onshore Receiving Facility for Hydrogen Blending Transportation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/adv.v4i8.604Keywords:
hydrogen blending, pipeline repurposing, subsea pipeline, hydrogen embrittlement, techno-economic analysisAbstract
Climate change and Indonesia’s net-zero emission target have accelerated interest in hydrogen as a low-carbon energy carrier, while the high cost of dedicated hydrogen infrastructure has encouraged the repurposing of existing natural gas pipelines. This study evaluated the technical and economic feasibility of repurposing the West Java FSRU–Muara Karang ORF subsea pipeline for hydrogen blending transportation. The research applied an integrated techno-economic assessment combining hydraulic simulation, material integrity evaluation, infrastructure requirement analysis, and financial feasibility assessment. Simulations were conducted for hydrogen blending concentrations of 0–30% under minimum, normal, and maximum plant-load conditions, with results validated through Python and MATLAB cross-checking. The results showed that increasing hydrogen concentration increased flow velocity by up to 33.5% and pressure drop by up to 27.0%, while the maximum pressure drop remained below the pipeline operating limit. API 5L X52/X65 pipeline materials were technically suitable; however, hydrogen embrittlement considerations supported an initial blending limit of 15%. From an economic perspective, both injection scenarios were feasible, but ORF-side injection demonstrated better performance, achieving a net present value (NPV) of USD 32.7 million, an internal rate of return (IRR) of 15.5%, a payback period of 6.1 years, and a levelized cost of hydrogen transportation (LCOHT) of USD 0.33/kg H?. Therefore, ORF-side injection with hydrogen concentrations of up to 15% is recommended for initial implementation, accompanied by periodic inspection, monitoring, and further experimental validation.
References
Agency, I. E. (2023). Global Hydrogen Review 2023. International Energy Agency.
Agency, I. E. (2024). Global Hydrogen Review 2024. International Energy Agency.
ASME. (2018). Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
ASME. (2019). Hydrogen Piping and Pipelines. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Genovese, M., & al, et. (2024). Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen transport through repurposed natural gas pipelines. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
Ghadiani, H., & al, et. (2024). Evaluation of hydrogen embrittlement resistance of API 5L pipeline steels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
ISO/DIS 19880-1. (2020). Gaseous Hydrogen — Fuelling Stations — Part 1: General Requirements. In International Organization for Standardization.
Kappes, M. A., & Perez, T. (2023). Hydrogen blending in existing natural gas transmission pipelines: A review of hydrogen embrittlement, governing codes, and life prediction methods. In Corrosion Reviews (Vol. 41, Number 3). https://doi.org/10.1515/corrrev-2022-0083
Koksharov, A., Taubmann, J., Riegraf, M., Costa, R., Latz, A., & Jahnke, T. (2021). Numerical Model of Co-Electrolysis in Solid Oxide Cells with Ni/Gd-Doped Ceria (CGO) Fuel Electrode. ECS Meeting Abstracts, MA2021-03(1). https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2021-031167mtgabs
Mahajan, D., & al, et. (2022). Repurposing natural gas pipelines for hydrogen: A review of technical and economic challenges. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
Martin, P., Ocko, I. B., Esquivel-Elizondo, S., Kupers, R., Cebon, D., Baxter, T., & Hamburg, S. P. (2024). A review of challenges with using the natural gas system for hydrogen. Energy Science & Engineering, 12, 3995–4009.
Mohitpour, M., Golshan, H., & Murray, A. (2007). Pipeline Design and Construction: A Practical Approach (3rd ed, Ed.). ASME Press.
Muazu, M. S., Sriramula, S., & Kapitaniak, M. (2026). A mechanistic stochastic assessment framework for repurposing natural gas pipelines for hydrogen transportation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 231, 154898.
Ohaeri, E., & al., et. (2018). Hydrogen induced cracking susceptibility of API 5L X65 pipeline steel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
Popescu, I. N., & Vidu, R. (2018). Compaction Behaviour Modelling of Metal-Ceramic Powder Mixtures. A Review. Scientific Bulletin of Valahia University - Materials and Mechanics, 16(14). https://doi.org/10.1515/bsmm-2018-0006
Sayani, J. K. S., Wang, M., Ma, Z., Sharan, P., Mehana, M., & Chen, B. (2025). Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen transport via repurposed natural gas pipelines: Flow dynamics and infrastructure tradeoffs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 147, 150033.
Summers, A., & al, et. (2026). Hydrogen embrittlement in subsea pipeline steels: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
Télessy, K., Barner, L., & Holz, F. (2024). Repurposing natural gas pipelines for hydrogen: Limits and options from a case study in Germany. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 80, 821–831.
V, D. N. (2023). Recommended Practice for Subsea Hydrogen Pipelines. DNV.
Wang, A., Jens, J., Mavins, D., & al, et. (2021). Analysing Future Demand, Supply, and Transport of Hydrogen: European Hydrogen Backbone.






